# Gemma 2B vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.8 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 32.6 |
| Rank | 305 | 242 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1236 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1220 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1246 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1233 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.