# Gemma 2B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 121 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1399 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1416 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Solar Pro4 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.