# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

> Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-vl-235b-a22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 43.2 |
| Rank | 307 | 95 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1439 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1428 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1426 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1442 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1408 |
| LMArena French | — | 1452 |
| LMArena German | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1420 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1428 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.