# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.6 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 305 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1448 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 142.41 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1479 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | — | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.