# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.5 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 305 | 186 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1413 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1364 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.