# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 30.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 307 | 22 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1496 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 156.41 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1538 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1479 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1489 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3.8 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.