# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 18.8.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 307 | 156 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 144.64 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.