# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3-4B

> Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 305 | 261 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.