# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 52.9 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 307 | 172 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1334 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1311 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3 32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.