# Gemma 2B vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 27.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 305 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen3 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.