# Gemma 2B vs Qwen2-72B

> Gemma 2B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 41.0 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 305 | 294 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 125.27 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 42.3% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen2-72B?

Gemma 2B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.9 vs 28.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen2-72B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.