# Gemma 2B vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.4 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 305 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1328 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Qwen Plus share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.