# Gemma 2B vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

> Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-phi-3-mini-4k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2B leads 18.8 to 14.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 27.9 |
| Rank | 307 | 328 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1093 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | 54.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 15.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1072 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | 71.7% |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | 76.7% |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | 70.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 26.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 34.7% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 52.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.4% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1111 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 15.7% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | 84.9% |
| MMLU | 42.3% | 68.8% |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | 64% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1045 |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1021 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1021 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1022 |
| LMArena French | — | 1076 |
| LMArena German | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 935 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 905 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1053 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 39.1% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1044 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1073 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1037 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 9.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 2B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.