# Gemma 2B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads 51.8 to 48.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 307 | 305 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1028 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.