# Gemma 2B vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Gemma 2B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.8 to 29.4.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 307 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 42.3% | 78% |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | 73.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Gemma 2B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2B or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and phi-3-medium 14B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.