# Gemma 2B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 305 | 301 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.9 vs 28.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.