# Gemma 2B vs Nova 2 Lite

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-nova-2-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 53.9 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 307 | 161 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1385 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1364 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1359 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1358 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1343 |
| LMArena French | — | 1381 |
| LMArena German | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1373 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1335 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1335 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1338 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Nova 2 Lite share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.