# Gemma 2B vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

> Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-nemotron-4-340b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 42.9 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 35.3 |
| Rank | 305 | 218 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1209 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1202 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1216 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1214 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1219 |
| LMArena French | — | 1196 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1195 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1203 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1225 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1214 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.