# Gemma 2B vs Nemotron 3 Super

> Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-nemotron-3-super
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Super in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 55.9 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 153 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1403 |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| WeirdML | — | 38% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1386 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1380 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1398 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1355 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1432 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1347 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1362 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1369 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Nemotron 3 Super share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.