# Gemma 2B vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.3 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 307 | 48 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1495 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1533 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1486 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 154.87 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1471 |
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1480 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1305 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1478 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | — | 1513 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1498 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1461 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1475 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1482 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1494 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.