# Gemma 2B vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 307 | 131 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1417 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Muse Glimmer share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.