# Gemma 2B vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.1 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 305 | 271 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 131.73 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.