# Gemma 2B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.6 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 305 | 151 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 141.42 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1432 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1431 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1443 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.