# Gemma 2B vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.3 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 305 | 201 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1350 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1336 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1367 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1332 |
| LMArena French | — | 1336 |
| LMArena German | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1332 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1362 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and MiniMax-M2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.