# Gemma 2B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 307 | 88 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1466 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1445 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1430 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.