# Gemma 2B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 305 | 137 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.