# Gemma 2B vs Longcat Flash Chat

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-longcat-flash-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 305 | 121 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1471 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1425 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1418 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Longcat Flash Chat share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.