# Gemma 2B vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.8 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 305 | 265 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1025 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1047 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1072 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1064 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1061 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1058 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.9 vs 29.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.