# Gemma 2B vs Llama 2-70B

> Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 2-70B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2B leads 27.6 to 7.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 24.1 |
| Rank | 305 | 343 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1079 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1073 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | 64.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 113.59 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | 85.3% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | 80.2% |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1091 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | 69.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | 88.6% |
| MMLU | 42.3% | 69.9% |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | 87.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 994 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1083 |
| LMArena French | — | 1089 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Llama 2-70B?

Gemma 2B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.8 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Llama 2-70B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.