# Gemma 2B vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 2B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-13B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 2B leads 18.8 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 307 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1062 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1051 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | 80.7% |
| PIQA | 77.3% | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | 72.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | 82.4% |
| MMLU | 42.3% | 55.6% |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | 79.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1001 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 2B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 2B or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Llama 2-13B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.