# Gemma 2B vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 30.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 307 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 149.97 |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.