# Gemma 2B vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 80 |
| Context | — | 66K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1451 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 148.54 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1465 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1490 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1429 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1434 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Inkling better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Inkling share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.