# Gemma 2B vs Inkling-Small

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-inkling-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.8 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 46.5 |
| Rank | 305 | 57 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1408 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1424 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 150.13 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1453 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1442 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1392 |
| LMArena French | — | 1438 |
| LMArena German | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1426 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1397 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1401 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1413 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1330 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1420 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.