# Gemma 2B vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.9 to 48.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 35.9 |
| Rank | 305 | 213 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1247 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1240 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1251 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1244 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1221 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1240 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1243 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.