# Gemma 2B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

> Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-hunyuan-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.4 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 39.0 |
| Rank | 305 | 165 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1320 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1308 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1273 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1279 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1309 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1303 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.