# Gemma 2B vs Grok Build 0.1

> Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-grok-build-0-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 43.1 to 29.4.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 307 | 216 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.