# Gemma 2B vs Grok 4

> Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-grok-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 leads 58.5 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 48.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 56 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 146.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1415 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1427 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1410 |
| LMArena French | — | 1418 |
| LMArena German | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok 4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.