# Gemma 2B vs Grok-3 mini

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-grok-3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.7 to 48.8.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.0 |
| Rank | 305 | 130 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1380 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1386 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1352 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1379 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1356 |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok-3 mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.