# Gemma 2B vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

> Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-grok-2-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.5 to 24.1.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 305 | 196 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1269 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1255 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1265 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1238 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | — | 1285 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1267 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1265 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.