# Gemma 2B vs Granite 4.0 Micro

> Gemma 2B and Granite 4.0 Micro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-granite-4-0-micro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 46.7 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 307 | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.017 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

Gemma 2B and Granite 4.0 Micro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.