# Gemma 2B vs GPT-6.1 Sol

> GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-gpt-6-1-sol
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 30.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 65.6 |
| Rank | 307 | 6 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1487 |
| DeepSWE | — | 75.2% |
| FrontierCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1755 |
| SciCode | — | 55.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 60% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 32% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1466 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | 166.09 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 94.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 95.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98.5% |
| CritPt | — | 31.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 61% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 54.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 80% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1464 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 93.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 100% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 95.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1502 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1288 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 80% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1438 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1477 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1455 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1468 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1432 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1449 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.