# Gemma 2B vs GLM-4.7

> GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-glm-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.7 leads 61.1 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 305 | 117 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- GLM-4.7: 43.6 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1435 |
| SciCode | — | 45.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 399.48 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.7: 26.4 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 33.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,377 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- GLM-4.7: 23.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | 143.53 |
| SimpleBench | — | 47.7% |
| CritPt | — | 1.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- GLM-4.7: 37.7 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1423 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 2.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 32.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1424 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- GLM-4.7: 53.0 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1495 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1423 |
| LMArena French | — | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1433 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- GLM-4.7: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1432 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 10.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- GLM-4.7: 61.1 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1413 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than GLM-4.7?

GLM-4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GLM-4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.