# Gemma 2B vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 307 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1390 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1368 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | — |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1371 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1340 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GLM-4.6V share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.