# Gemma 2B vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 24.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 307 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1354 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 2B: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1332 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and GLM-4.5V share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.