# Gemma 2B vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2b-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.3 to 24.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 305 | 203 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2B: 28.9 (#300)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1269 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2B: 17.9 (#275)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 93.57 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2B: 27.6 (#237)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2B: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1245 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2B: 23.1 (#289)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1310 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1288 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2B: 48.8 (#297)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 971 | 1255 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#286)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1277 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2B: 24.1 (#303)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 986 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2B better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2B or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 28.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.