# Gemma 2 9B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 9.9.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 341 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.4 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.