# Gemma 2 9B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.9 to 9.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 341 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1173 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1171 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.83 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1190 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1334 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.