# Gemma 2 9B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 9.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 334 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | — |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | — |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | — |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.