# Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 51.4 |
| Rank | 334 | 35 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1483 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | 153.74 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1488 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | — |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1460 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1484 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.