# Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-2-9b-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 9.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Gemma 2 9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.7 | 51.1 |
| Rank | 334 | 36 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.80 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 2 9B: 29.0 (#299)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1174 | 1472 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 34.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 22.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 2 9B: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 2 9B: 15.3 (#306)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1172 | 1457 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.78 | 149.27 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 87.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 36.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |
| LiveBench | 28.7% | — |
| PIQA | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.3 (#312)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1183 | 1465 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
| GSM8K | 84.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#300)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.5% | 87.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1147 | 1476 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| BoolQ | 85.7% | — |
| MMLU | 72.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.8 (#233)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1188 | 1436 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1185 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1189 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1200 | 1444 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1200 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1137 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 2 9B: 57.8 (#264)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1178 | 1437 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 52.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#228)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1197 | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 2 9B: 32.3 (#276)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 2 9B | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1207 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1206 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1193 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 841 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 2 9B better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 25.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 2 9B or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.